From
The Miscellaneous
Reference Material
For Information Only Library
And We the People For Independent Texas :
Scroll Each Page To View All Articles ;
In the recent case of United States vs. Moran,
482 F.3d 1101, 1110 (9th Cir. 2007), tax
convictions were reversed when a defendant
was prevented from fully explaining the matters
upon which she had relied. ;
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/wtpcc/message/2936
Official Definition of
DEMOCRACY vs. REPUBLIC ! ;
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/wtpcc/message/2937
The Common Law recognizes that the Power of
Government lies in the common people and not in
an elite group of power brokers.
It is the terrible Equity, Maritime and Admiralty
Laws (laws of contract) that steal this power
from the people and centralizes it into the hands
of a few power oriented men. ;
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/wtpcc/message/2938
Instead of being able to demand payment at Law,
or to make payment in Standard Gold Dollars as
Lawful money, or the equivalent Treasury
currency, redeemable on demand, at Par,
We The People were forced on to the credit of
the private banks, the Federal Reserve Banks and
the commercial banks, and began to pass around
their debt instruments, as though it were real
money, making use of their debt-claims for the
money, and thereby, by the operation of
House Joint Resolution No, 192, into an alien
and unlawful Federal Executive Equity Jurisdiction,
known as lex mercatoria, or the Law Merchant,
which is the private rule of the bankers, and from
which jurisdiction our forefathers fought, and won,
a revolution to be free, and from which jurisdiction
our Constitution and Bill of Rights protects Us. ;
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/wtpcc/message/2939
I understand that if the exercise of the rights of
the people were subject to taxation, those rights
could be destroyed by increasing the tax rates to
unaffordable levels, and that therefore courts have
repeatedly ruled that government has no power to
tax the exercise of any rights of citizens, as shown
by the United States Supreme Court in the case
of Murdock vs.. Pennsylvania, 319 U.S. 105 (1943)
in which the court stated,
A state may not impose a charge for the
enjoyment of a right "granted"
by the Federal Constitution. ;
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/wtpcc/message/2940
WTPFIT
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/wtpcc/messages?o=1
Send Questions
Or Comments To :
wtpfit@gmail.com
