Impeachment is a constitutional remedy to be used
for serious offenses identified in the Constitution.
So, we must ask this question :
Has Barack Obama crossed the line that separates
political differences from the serious offenses that
warrant impeachment?
The Constitution's provisions for impeachment and
removal are not aimed solely at the office of president.
Article II, Section 4, stipulates that "the President,
Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States,
shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and
Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high crimes
and misdemeanors."
I believe there is a growing body of evidence of
impeachable offenses sufficient to warrant a formal
impeachment resolution in the House, followed by
a trial in the Senate.
It is instructive that the founders listed only two specific
crimes justifying impeachment - bribery and treason.
The accusations of bribery against this president
are now numerous and growing, and by themselves
deserve an independent investigation under supervision
of a bipartisan committee of the House
of Representatives.
In Pennsylvania and Colorado, candidates for the
U.S. Senate were offered federal appointments in
exchange for dropping out of their respective races.
On their face, those actions are attempted bribery
and warrant a thorough investigation.
There are also presidential actions that may stray
into the category of high crimes and misdemeanors
http://www.wnd.com/index.php/index.php?pageId=171077
Illegal Alien Trespasser Saboteurs
of the Global Commie Unionist Corporate
Criminal Regimes ;
Local tea-party groups from Orlando to Phoenix
and San Diego to Nashville have rallied to support
Arizona's new immigration law.
Over the past 15 months since the beginning of the
tea-party movement, there has been an organized
effort to keep the immigration issue
off the tea-party agenda.
That effort has failed.
Score round one a victory for grass-roots democracy.
The effort to keep immigration off the tea-party
agenda has not been any kind of conspiracy; in fact,
it has been quite open and unapologetic.
For example, the national Tea Party Patriots, which
is affiliated with Richard Armey's Washington, D.C.-
based Freedom Works organization, has been vocal
and systematic in excluding immigration-related
concerns from its "Contract from America."
Touted as a grass-roots poll of tea-party members,
the poll from its inception has barred any attempt to
add immigration concerns to the poll's menu of issues.
Thus, the lack of any reference to border security
or immigration enforcement in the final "Contract"
comes as no surprise.
Fortunately, the real world
intervened, and real patriots found their voice
http://www.wnd.com/index.php/index.php?pageId=168369
